Employee referral programs in 5 steps: Part 7
Monday, October 6th, 2008Download pdf version of this report (35 pages)
Manage your referral program.
· The submission of “names” only (i.e. no resumes) for top candidates should be accepted and encouraged (top performers will often opt-out of a bureaucratic process).
· Accountability and budget allocations.
It’s amazing how many organizations delegate the referral program to a junior person or intern. If you want to reenergize your program, rotate someone into the job with a background in marketing. Managing the referral program should be someone’s full-time job, and the percentage of the recruiting budget that is allocated to it should correspond with the percentage of total hires it produces. The fact that referrals seem “easy” is no reason to under-appreciate and under-fund them. Getting “top performer” referrals requires great talent, time, and money.
· Make the rules simple.
Complex submission rules will dissuade employees from participating. Try to create guidelines that are easily understood. However, make sure you address problematic areas, such as how to deal with a situation in which two people claim to have referred the same candidate who ultimately was hired.
· Avoid employee program manager turnover.
Because of weak metrics, most employee referral programs are under-appreciated by recruiting, HR, and senior management. As a result, turnover rates among ERP program managers are quite high. Because the learning curve is steep, the replacement manager almost always “damages” even the strongest referral program. In order to avoid this problem, the position needs to be given as much recognition and pay as necessary to encourage the program manager to stay in it for at least three years. If the person running the program views this position as one small step on their way to becoming an HR generalist, you have made a bad hiring decision.
· Add mechanisms for resolving disputes over who “gets credit” for duplicate referrals. There should be an appeal process for individuals who feel they were unjustly denied a referral bonus.
· Maintain clear records.
By time-dating each resume that has the properly filled out referral card, for example, you can avoid potential problems. Keep data that list the referral, the date, the name of the candidate, all pertinent candidate data, a copy of the resume/application, and a copy of the referral form. Also, when the status of the referral changes, update it accordingly.
· Don’t allow referral spamming.
Designing a process that allows individuals to inundate the referral system with high-volume, low-quality resumes will cause the program to suffer or even fail. If you allow it, some employees will bring you stacks of resumes that they got from a recruiter friend or from the Internet. Although it’s tempting to accept them, never accept large volumes of resumes or referrals. The reason for this is that the person giving a large volume of referrals cannot know them all, and one of the key design features for program success is that employees only refer people they know on a professional level. Unless it’s an unusual circumstance, limit referrals to no more than three a month for many individuals.
· Historical data.
Add a feature where an employee’s “next referral” is weighted based on the success of previous referrals.
· Gather metrics for continuous improvement.
Surveys reveal that well over 75 percent of referral programs do not use metrics to monitor the performance and health of their programs. An even greater percentage of organizations do not evaluate the on-the-job performance of new hires by source. Without this crucial metric, you cannot calculate the added value of referrals. Other metrics need to be kept on voluntary turnover, offer acceptance rates, and termination rates. Employee participation rate by reporting group can be a particularly telling metric. Some metrics you may consider proposing include:
- “On-the-job” performance of referral hires (measure and compare the ERP’s performance ratings to other sources of candidates)
- Program ROI
- Retention (turnover rate) of referral hires
- Percentage of all hires who come from referrals (variant: percentage of key jobs filled by referrals)
- Manager/referee/referrer satisfaction with the referral program
- Percentage of diversity referrals/hires (especially in management and key jobs)
- Process time by step (delay from referral point to interview date, which results in fewer top performer hires)
- Employee participation rate in the referral program
- Cost per hire (as compared to other sources)
· Distribute ranked referral metrics to managers.
It’s not enough to gather metrics about referral programs. If you really want to drive performance, distribute ranked referral results by individual manager. The report should go to each manager every month so that they can see by name where they rank against others on producing quality hires. There is no tool that will get managers attention faster than distributing ranked metrics. Distribute a “best to worst” list of company-wide departmental referral performance in order to embarrasses dawdlers.






